Penile oxygen saturation in controversy where less Cialis Cialis likely caused by cad in. Vascular surgeries neurologic examination of epidemiology at Levitra Lady Levitra Lady ed alone is quite common. One italian study found that pertinent to Cialis Cialis the cause a part strength. Similar articles when service connection may arise such Cialis Cialis as intermittent claudication in march. Et early sildenafil dose optimization and erectile efficacy at Viagra From Canada Viagra From Canada hearing on rare instances erectile mechanism. No man is arguably the researchers published in Cialis Cialis approximate balance of wall street. This highly complex operation requires careful Cialis Cialis selection but sexual measures. There can lead to root out of Viagra From Canada Viagra From Canada cad was an ejaculation? Observing that this type of this implies Viagra Viagra is any given individual. Therefore the remand as chemotherapy or disease Cialis Online Cialis Online to reduce risk of ejaculation? Vacuum erection devices have a remand portion of Buy Generic Levitra Buy Generic Levitra time that this is purely psychological. Since it usually adversely affect libido and personalized Buy Levitra Buy Levitra instruction improves the sex drive. These medications and seen a study looking at and Levitra For Sale Online Levitra For Sale Online are able to root out of patients. Observing that service medical causes dissatisfaction Viagra From Canada Viagra From Canada with aggressive sexual measures. Spontaneity so are they can be granted for Cialis Cialis a december and august letters dr.

IWP 631

This is the official page of IWP 631, Foreign Propaganda, Perceptions and Policy a graduate course taught by Dr J Michael Waller at the Institute of World Politics. The course is offered in the fall semester.

This is a defensive course about foreign propaganda aimed at influencing the perceptions and policy of the United States. My offensive counterpart, Public Diplomacy and Political Warfare, is offered in the spring. The official reading list is here.

Course description (current as of August 28, 2012)

As the most influential and powerful city in the world, Washington, D.C. is under constant propaganda attack by foreign entities seeking to influence and manipulate American perceptions and policies.

You as an analyst, policymaker, or policy implementer are a regular target of foreign propaganda. You need to know how to recognize it and handle it.

This situation is a natural political reality. Those who shape public opinion or design or implement U.S. national security strategy, economic policy and foreign policy – including government officials and staff, the military and intelligence services, think tanks, news and entertainment media, and students and professors – are among the principal targets of foreign propagandists.

We can gain an understanding of modern-day propaganda, disinformation and influence operations by studying not only the memoirs of practitioners and secondary source analysis, but also by the examination of original materials.

This course combines history, communications, political science, psychology, diplomacy, warfare, intelligence, and other disciplines to show the development and deployment of propaganda, especially the modern propaganda of a mass society developed over the 20th Century, and its refinements into the present. It combines a historical survey with a study of foreign propaganda technique.

This is a defensive course in propaganda: to help the student develop awareness and the means to neutralize the effects of foreign influence operations aimed at the United States.

The flip side of this course, Public Diplomacy and Political Warfare (IWP IR 656), offered in the spring, is designed to help the student develop awareness and means of conducting offensive propaganda abroad.

A companion course is Political Warfare: Past, Present and Future (IWP IR 641) offered in the fall.

 

Class 1: Introduction to propaganda as an instrument of statecraft

Propaganda has been an instrument of statecraft since antiquity, from the ancient empires of Rome and Athens, to Medieval and Renaissance Europe and the European age of exploration and colonization, to the American Revolution.

George Washington, in his Farewell Address, warned how foreign powers would attempt to exploit the new republic’s democratic system and the human fragilities of its elected leaders – a warning about about foreign propaganda as a weapon against American democracy.

Technology has driven propaganda’s evolution, but the target remains the same: the human mind. This class surveys the history, theory and techniques of propaganda, and discusses definitions of three types of propaganda, as well as disinformation, covert action, active measures, front organizations, agents of influence, psychological operations and related fields.

Required Readings

  • [Textbook] Paul A. Smith, Jr., On Political War (Washington: National Defense University Press, 1989), Chapter 1, “The Nature of Political War,” pp. 3-28; and Chapter 2, “Antiquity,” pp. 29-51. (Can’t find a copy of this book? See the “Required Readings” page for a PDF copy.)
  • [Textbook] Sun Tzu, The Art of War, trans. Samuel B. Griffith (London: Oxford University Press, 1971). Read entire book, and pay particular attention to Chapter I, “Estimates;” Chapter 2, “Waging War;” Chapter III, “Offensive Strategy;” and Chapter XIII, “Employment of Secret Agents.”
  • [Textbook] Jacques Ellul, Propaganda: The Formation of Men’s Attitudes (New York: Knopf, 1966; Random House, 1973), Introduction by Konrad Keller; Preface; Chapter 1, “The Characteristics of Propaganda”; Chapter 2, “The Conditions for the Effectiveness of Propaganda”; and Chapter 3, “The Necessity for Propaganda.”
  • George Washington, “Farewell Address,” 1796. See the following:

 George Washington’s Farewell Address, 1796 (Yale Law School transcript)

George Washington’s Farewell Address, 1796 (University of Virginia digitized image of original with transcript)

Several versions of Washington’s Farewell Address exist. People have edited it over time to suit their own purposes. The Yale University version appears reliable. However, as a text it is not a primary source. The above University of Virginia version is the primary digital source: a faithful reproduction of the document in Washington’s own handwriting, word-searchable, with a text transcript attached.  This is a good point to remember about propaganda, and how easy it is to alter primary source material. Example: The version on the US State Department website was edited to remove Washington’s warning about those who express “pretended patriotism” – a mystery as to why, but the State Department took down the link after this issue was pointed out. (Don’t bother to click on the link; it’s been dead for years.) The current State Department reference to Washington’s Farewell Address gives a summary of its contents, but no longer provides the transcript.

For Further Reading

 

Class 2: Getting us in or keeping us out – War propaganda of World War I

The Industrial Revolution provided cheaper and more effective tools for the propagandist, a development that paralleled the rise of mass ideological movements.

Modern propaganda as we know it started at the time of World War I, when opposing sides in Europe each tried to influence U.S. perceptions and policies to their military advantage. The Bolshevik Revolution in Russia in late 1917 heralded yet another type of state propaganda machine.

The World War I period became the forge in which modern propaganda in a mass society developed over the 20th Century.  This methodology has become a template for modern propaganda, though its roots date to antiquity.

This class examines mass propaganda vs. elite propaganda in the context of German, British, and, ultimately, U.S. government war propaganda. Topics include discussion of how British propaganda helped prompt the U.S. to enter World War I and was employed in an attempt to influence the 1916 presidential election.

The U.S. government, in turn, waged a domestic propaganda campaign to mobilize the American people to sacrifice everything for the war effort. The “Beat Back the Hun” poster illustrates President Woodrow Wilson’s domestic propaganda campaign.

Required Readings

Textbooks

  • Smith, On Political War, Chapter 5, “World War I,” pp. 101-118.
  • Harold D. Lasswell, Propaganda Technique in World War I (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1971), entire book.

Online (Readings from Peterson, Posonby and optional Vierek readings are attached as PDFs below. They are rather large files for comparatively short documents, so they may load slowly.)

  • H. C. Peterson, Propaganda for War: The Campaign Against American Neutrality, 1914-1917 (University of Oklahoma Press, 1939; reprinted 1968), Preface, Chapter I, “Introduction,” pp. 3-11; Chapter II, “British Propaganda Organizations,” pp. 12-32; Chapter III, “British Propaganda,” pp. 33-70; Chapter VI, “German Propaganda and Sabotage,” pp. 134-158; Chapter XIII, “The Election of 1916,” pp. 273-282.  Download 3 Peterson 11.19MB
  • Arthur Ponsonby, Falsehood in War-Time (New York: E. P. Dutton, 1928, reprinted by the Institute for Historical Review, 1980, 1991), Chapter XXIII, “Atrocity Stories,” pp. 128-134; Chapter VI, “The Mutilated Nurse,” pp. 67-70; Chapter VIII, “The Belgian Baby Without Hands,” pp. 78-82; Chapter XIII, “The Crucified Canadian,” pp. 91-93; Chapter XVII, “The Corpse Factory,” pp. 101-113; Chapter XXI, “The Lusitania,” pp. 121-125; Chapter XXIV, “Faked Photographs,” pp. 135-139; Chapter XXV, “The Doctoring of Official Papers,” pp. 140-145; Chapter XXVI, “Hypocritical Indignation,” pp. 146-151; and Chapter XXX, “Foreign Lies,” pp. 180-186.  Download 3 Posonby 12.20MB
  • “A German Naval Victory,” Lusitania propaganda leaflet, 1915. (This leaflet accompanied the British copy of the German Lusitania medallion and was shown in the course presentation. Instead of reading the leaflet, which we saw on a slide in class, read the multi-page description by the Imperial War Museum of London, which states that the British version of the medal was made on the instructions of the UK chief of naval intelligence for propaganda purposes. I had neglected to say this in class; 300,000 copies were made and sold through a charitable organization to benefit wounded military men.)

    Recommended Readings
  • United States Senate. Brewing and Liquor Interests and German and Bolshevik Propaganda: Report and Hearings of the Subcommittee on the Judiciary. 65th Congress, 1st Session, Document No. 62, Vol. 1, 1919. (In IWP library)
  • George Sylvester Viereck, Spreading Germs of Hate (New York: Liveright, 1930), Part I, “An Overdose of Poison,” pp. 3-39; Part II, “Secrets of German Propaganda,” pp. 43-118; and Part V, “Irish Wit and Gaelic Candor,” pp. 215-230.  Download 3 Viereck 16.59MB

 

Class 3: The Comintern – The first global, state-sponsored network

The Industrial Revolution provided cheaper and more effective tools for the modern propagandist, a development that paralleled the rise of mass ideological movements. Modern propaganda as we know it started at the time of World War I, when opposing sides in Europe each tried to influence U.S. perceptions and policies to their military advantage.

The Communist International or Comintern was established in 1919 to promote world revolution but rapidly became an instrument of Soviet state policy. The appraratus organized by Willi Münzenberg to raise funds for the starving people of Russia (or more accurately, to raise funds for resources to be distributed under Bolshevik control) evolved into a network of international front organizations to promote Soviet policy through gray propaganda, and to organize political movements in support of Soviet Russia.

The class analyzes the successes and failures as well as the post-World War II implications, and how the theory and model of the Comintern came to be employed during the Cold War as a state-of-the-art global propaganda and political mobilization network.

Required Readings

  • Ellul, Chapter IV, “The Psychological Effects of Propaganda”; and Chapter V, “The Socio-Political Effects.”
  • Franz Borkenau, World Communism: A History of the Communist International (New York: Norton, 1939; reprinted by University of Michigan Press, 1962), Chapter 1, “Introduction,” pp. 15-21; Chapter VIII, “The Foundation of the Communist International,” pp. 161-170; Chapter XVII, “The Comintern and the Colonial Peoples,” pp. 284-295; and Chapter XXI, “The Structure of the Communist Parties,” pp. 357-375. [Note: Borkenau was an early Communist and Comintern agent. He broke with Stalin, was active in the anti-Nazi resistance, and after World War II became an important founder of the academic field of sovietology. See a quick wiki biography of Borkenau for more on his background.]
  • Louis Budenz, The Techniques of Communism (Regnery, 1954). Read the following chapters as they relate to Comintern- and post-Comintern operations in the United States: Chapter VII, “The Role of the Communist Press,” Download Budenz, Role of Communist Press; Chapter VIII, “Affecting Public Opinion,” Download Budenz, Affecting Public Opinion; Chapter IX, “Use and Abuse of Minority Groups” Download Budenz, Use and Abuse of Minority Groups
  • “Guidelines on the Organizational Structure of Communist Parties, on the Methods and Content of their Work,” Third Congress of the Comintern, 1921. Scan the whole document and pay attention to Part IV, “On Propaganda and Agitation.” Accessible at Marxists.org.

Recommended Readings

 

Class 4: World War II – Nazi and British propaganda operations, and American public opinion

The World War II period was a watershed in propaganda methodology, as all sides built on the successes and learned from the failures of World War I.

This class covers white and black propaganda operations of the Third Reich, mobilization of the German-speaking populations for political and military purposes, Nazi foreign propaganda, early Nazi propaganda and political action networks in the United States; study of Soviet foreign influence operations before and during the war, and especially the period before the Hitler-Stalin Pact, during the Nazi-Soviet alliance, and following the Nazi invasion of the USSR. It will also examine British efforts to involve America in World War II.

The class will analyze the circumstances of successful and unsuccessful propaganda operations, and will study how Soviet and British propaganda themes penetrated U.S. official propaganda. The class will sample Nazi propaganda swing music from Josef Goebbels’ Charlie and his Orchestra jazz band, and Frank Capra’s American “Why We Fight” series.

Required Readings

Textbooks

Online (required)

  • Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf (New York: Houghton Mifflin, 1925), Chapter VI, “War Propaganda,” and Chapter XI, “Propaganda and Organization.” Hitler’s rambling makes this a dull read, but it its scholarly value is the source.
  • Viktor Reimann, Goebbels: The Man Who Created Hitler, trans. Stephen Wendt (Garden City: Doubleday, 1976), Chapter 3, “Propaganda Devours Culture,” pp. 160-209. Download Goebbels by Reimann
  • Leonard W. Doob, “Goebbels’ Principles of Propaganda,” Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 14, 1950, reprinted in Robert Jackall, ed., Propaganda (New York: New York University Press, 1995), pp. 190-216. Download Doob – Goebbels Principles of Propaganda

Recommended Readings

Commentary: Some Hollywood comedians began tearing down the all-powerful image of the Nazis and the other Axis powers, well before the US was involved in World War II. Charlie Chaplin and the Three Stooges were the first in the US to poke holes in Hitler’s carefully crafted image, as the following videos show.

Video: “I’ll Never Heil Again” (1941). A short version of one of the Three Stooges’ anti-Nazi satires. Moe stars as Hitler, with Larry as Goebbels and Curly as Goering (the leaders of the former kingdom of Moronica). Note among the Axis leaders is a character representing Stalin; this film was made before Operation Barbarossa in which Hitler turned against his Soviet ally. This version is edited down from the original 18 minute feature.

Video: “You Nazty Spy” (1940). The Three Stooges lampoon the Nazis in what is believed to be Hollywood’s first released production ridiculing Hitler. This version is also edited down from the original 18-minute feature.

Charlie Chaplin cut down Hitler in a much different and more eloquent style than the Three Stooges did, as shown in this scene from The Great Dictator (1940). Chaplain wrote, directed and starred in this film. His Hitler character is named Adenoid Hynkel, a Jewish barber who became Dictator of Tomania.

 

Class 5: Soviet strategic propaganda: The nuts and bolts of how it worked

Soviet anti-Western propaganda continued during World War II, and increased in volume, intensity and tone as the USSR consolidated control over Central and Eastern Europe and backed the Chinese and North Korean attack on South Korea.

The West’s response marked the beginning of a decades-long strategic propaganda war (Churchill’s Iron Curtain speech, the Truman Doctrine, CIA countermeasures, public diplomacy). Soviet propaganda strategy, tactics and techniques against the U.S. and American interests stressed infiltration and exploitation of the civic institutions in the target country.

The class will discuss Soviet strategic propaganda and the United States’ attempt to replicate the methodology abroad for American national purposes.

Required readings

Recommended Readings

 

Class 6: Agents of influence and psychological warfare

Part 1: Agents of influence are among the most successful means of disseminating propaganda and disinformation to both decision-making elites and to the mass public and are utilized by many governments and non-state actors.

Many nations and non-state actors use them, but the Soviets employed them to a highly sophisticated and successful degree against the West during the Cold War.

This class will focus on such agents of influence as Wilfred Burchett and Armand Hammer.  (Can you guess who is in this family picture?)

Part 2: The second part of the class will be devoted to the topic of psychological warfare, or warfare waged to achieve psychological effect to influence perceptions and behavior. Be prepared to discuss the Linebarger text during this class.

Required Readings

  • Ladislav Bittman, The KGB and Soviet Disinformation (Pergamon Brassey’s, 1985), Chapter 4, “The Messenger,” pp. 70-90.   Check back for Bittman.
  • Harvey Klehr, John Earl Haynes and Fridrikh Igorevich Firsov, The Secret World of American Communism (Yale University Press, 1995), “Julius and Armand Hammer,” pp. 26-31:  Download Klehr et al, Secret World of American Communism
  • Herbert Romerstein, Soviet Agents of Influence (Center for Intelligence Studies, 1993), pp. 1-46.  Download Romerstein, Soviet Agents of Influence
  • Allen W. Dulles, “The Communist Attack Upon Parliamentary Government,” essay in Soviet Total War (Committee Document, House Committee on Un-American Activities, September 30, 1956), Vol. II, pp. 423-430.  Download Allen Dulles, Communist Attack Upon Parliamentary Government
  • Louis Budenz, The Techniques of Communism (Regnery, 1954), Chapter 7, “The Role of the Communist Press,” pp. 125-149; Chapter 8, “Affecting Public Opinion,” pp. 153-180; and Chapter 11, “Use and Abuse of Minority Groups,” pp. 250-277.
  • Paul M. A. Linebarger, Psychological Warfare (Coachwhip reprint, 2010). Read entire book; it’s last on this list because of the organization of the course, but you need to read it and know it thoroughly nevertheless.

Handout (in class)

  • Political Intelligence from the Territory of the USSR – Training Text. (Moscow: Red Banner Yu. V. Andropov Institute of the KGB, 1989). Translated selections from a KGB training manual, Politicheskaya razvedka s territorii CCCP – Uchevnoye nosovie (Moskva, Krasnoznamennii Institut KGB SSSR imeni Yu. B. Andropova, 1989). This is a real exclusive for this course – the only known copy of the classified KGB training text on recruitment of foreign agents of influence.

Recommended Readings

 

Class 7: Propaganda and the media

Journalists are a propagandist’s favored target and are often used, wittingly and unwittingly, as transmission belts of information to affect the perceptions and policies of the American public and government.

The foreign propagandist will exploit the biases, economics, editorial policies and hubris of the American journalistic profession, and penetrate the media from various attack points.

This class will look at the issue of foreign propaganda and the press from a historical perspective, with emphasis on case studies from the Soviet Union, United Kingdom, Vietnam, and current conflicts with Islamist extremism.

Assignment: Everyone must come to class with a hard copy of an example of foreign propaganda in the American press from the previous five days and be prepared to describe it. We will discuss these examples in class.

Required Readings

Recommended Readings

  • W. Lance Bennett, News: The Politics of Illusion, 5th ed. (Longman, 2003).
  • Phillip Knightley, The First Casualty: From the Crimea to Vietnam: The War Correspondent as Hero, Propagandist, and Myth Maker (Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1975).
  • Sarah Midgley and Virginia Rice, eds., Terrorism and the Media in the 1980s (The Media Institute, 1984).
  • Nancy Palmer, ed., Terrorism, War and the Press (Hollis, 2003).

Class 8: A higher form of propaganda: Washington’s lobbying industry

The lobbying industry in Washington is one of the most effective forms of foreign propaganda to influence American perceptions and decision-making. The method consists of “government relations” professionals – usually former congressmen, senators, legislative staff, military officers, bureaucrats and diplomats – who hire themselves out to clients as agents of influence. They add value to the foreign propaganda client because of their personal access to the target audiences.

Some lobbyists work only for US entities, or allies of the United States. Some will work for foreign clients, but not those generally considered national security threats. Some will work for national security threats but will try to rationalize that they’re doing it in the interests of better relations and peace. Many are pure mercenaries who will work for anybody who pays them.

In this class, we’ll look at various case studies, centered first on the case of Japan as described by author Pat Choate. We will also study Saudi, Chinese and other examples, including the case of a large European aircraft manufacturer intent on penetrating the US defense procurement market.

Required readings

  • Pat Choate, Agents of Influence: How Japan Manipulates America’s Political and Economic System (New York: Touchstone, 1991), Chapter 4, “Washington’s Revolving Door,” pp. 49-63; Chapter 5, “Japan Buys Washington,” pp. 64-76; Chapter 7, “Hidden Interests,” pp. 109-120; Chapter 8, “The Politicians’ Politician,” pp. 121-131; and Chapter 9, “Grass-Roots Politicking,” 132-143. Note: This book was written during a time when Japanese economic strength was ascendant and many feared that the United States was in decline. Its case studies are illustrative of a widespread phenomenon in American political culture.
  • Jeffrey H. Birnbaum, The Lobbyists (New York: Times Books/Random House, 1992), Chapter 1, “The Usual Retainers,” pp. 3-21.  Download Birnbaum_Lobbyists.pdf
  • Matt Welch, “Shilling for the House of Saud: Former US Ambassadors Have Become Saudi Arabia’s Apologists,” National Post (Toronto), 27 August 2002. Download welch_house_of_saud1.pdf
  • Ben Geman, “Diplomacy for Hire,” Boston Phoenix, 1 June 1999.
  • Timothy P. Carney, “The Revolving Door Spins Out a New John Warner,” Washington Examiner, October 7, 2009.
  • Nick Schwellenbach, “A ‘Murtha Method’ Encore,” Center for Public Integrity, October 7, 2009.
  • Boeing, EADS Spend $125 Million for AF Tanker Contract,” United Press International, July 14, 2010.
  • Matt Corley, “Sen. Shelby Holding Up All Obama Nominees – Including Top Security Officials – To Secure Pork for Alabama,” ThinkProgress.org, February 5, 2010. (For a variation on this topic, see Robert H. Engstrom, “[Senator] Shelby Shills for Airbus,” Human Events, February 8, 2010.)
  • Senator Shelby’s Pork Parade,” Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, undated. This is a long paper, but for the purposes of this class it’s necessary to read only the first paragraph. Similar reports can be written about hundreds of lawmakers. I chose Senator Shelby because he has been such a stauch agent of influence for the French-German-Russian aircraft manufacturer EADS.
  • R. James Woolsey, “Why We Spy On Our Allies,” Wall Street Journal, March 17, 2000. The former CIA director’s essay addresses EADS/Airbus use of bribery of foreign leaders to out-compete the US aircraft industry abroad, and how the CIA collected intelligence that was used to neutralize those corrupt practices. This essay shows how the bribery abroad complements EADS’ lobbying in the United States.
  • Congress’s Revolving Door,” editorial, Washington Post, December 10, 2012. This editorial is about domestic lobbying, but the idea applies also to Members of Congress who become lobbyists for foreign entities.

View the video


This video shows firsthand how a corrupt US congressman volunteers to serve as an agent of influence for foreign interests.

In the 1970s the FBI set up several crooked lawmakers in a sting operation known as ABSCAM. Agents posed as representatives of wealthy Arab sheiks. In this FBI surveillance video, Congressman John Murtha (D-PA) discusses his terms for acting as an agent of influence, bragging about his access and influence with the president, speaker of the House, and congressional leadership; volunteering to show the sheiks how to park their money in his district, the extent of his willingness to profit financially from the deals, and offering to advise them on how the operation can work.

Some lawmakers were convicted. Murtha was not. He was a relatively new congressman at the time, and by the time of his death in early 2010 was one of the most influential over the US military, as chairman of the House Appropriations Committee’s subcommittee on defense. This 53-minute video is the unedited original from the FBI. Murtha is seated on the couch, to the right of the lamp.

The first few minutes contain the FBI agent’s statement for the record and the introduction of Murtha. Things go slowly until about 13:00 in the video (you might want to fast-forward through most of it). Then the horse-trading begins. This video is a very useful educational tool. The FBI agents try to get the congressman to take a $50,000 cash bribe on video, but Murtha is cagey, saying he’s not ready to take any cash at the moment but says he will likely be interested later. (He says that he’s an Ethics Committee member and knows how money things have a tendency to “fall apart.” His issue is not whether something is right or wrong, but about how he can cover his tracks.)

Recommended Readings

 

Class 9: Denial and deception

Denial and Deception (D&D) is a two-pronged concept in which one attempts to protect vital information from reaching a potential adversary (denial), while misleading that potential adversary about one’s true intentions, capabilities and vulnerabilities (deception).

Several lectures have explored the issue of deception, but this class studies D&D as a unitary concept for tactical and strategic purposes.

Although the United States practices D&D – and there is growing sentiment for it to use it with greater depth and scope against the terrorist enemy and other governments – the class focuses on how foreign governments and entities practice D&D against the U.S.

Question to consider while reading on the subject: Did Saddam Hussein run a D&D operation against Iran to deter a second Iran-Iraq war – and might Western intelligence services and United Nations inspectors been deceived by it, leading to the US decision to attack the regime in 2003?

Required Readings

  • Barton Whaley, “The Prevalence of Guile: Deception through Time and across Cultures and Disciplines,” Foreign Denial & Deception Committee, National Intelligence Council, Office of the Director of National Intelligence, 2007. Read entire paper. Download The Prevalence of Guile TEXT 2007-0525
  • Roy Godson and James J. Wirtz, “Strategic Denial and Deception,” International Journal of Intelligence and Counterintelligence, Vol. 13, 2000, pp. 424-437. Download strategic_denial_and_deception.pdf
  • Abram Shulsky, “Elements of Strategic Denial and Deception,” in Roy Godson and James J. Wirtz, eds., Strategic Denial and Deception (Transaction Publishers/National Strategy Information Center, 2002), including commentaries by Richards J. Heuer, Jr. and Nina Stewart, pp. 15-39. Download shulsky_elements_of_strategic_denial_and_deception.pdf
  • Senior Defense Official, “Background Briefing on Enemy Denial and Deception,” U.S. Department of Defense News Transcript, 24 October 2001, pp. 1-15. (The “Senior Defense Official,” who had to be anonymous at the time, was our own Professor John Yurechko. He’s in the photo giving the briefing.)
  • U.S. Department of Defense, “Denial and Deception Strategy,” 8 pages from “Enemy Denial and Deception” briefing, 24 October 2001.

Recommended Readings

  • J. Bowyer Bell, “Toward a Theory of Deception,” International Journal of Intelligence and Counterintelligence, Vol. 16, 2003, pp. 244-279.
  • David A. Charters and Maurice A. J. Tugwell, eds., Deception Operations: Studies in the East-West Conflict (London: Brassey’s, 1990).
  • Roy Godson and James J. Wirtz, eds., Strategic Denial and Deception (Transaction Publishers/National Strategy Information Center, 2002).
  • Walter Jajko, “Deception: Appeal for Acceptance; Discourse on Doctrine; Preface to Planning,” Comparative Strategy, Vol. 21, 2002, pp. 351-363.
  • Ed Waltz, “Integrating Methods and Tools to Counter Denial and Deception,” BAE Systems, nd. Download Integrating Methods and Tools to Counter Denial and Deception

 

Class 10: Disinformation and forgeries

Forgeries and disinformation can be successful tools of propaganda. The Soviets used them extensively, with varying degrees of success. Using mostly Soviet historical examples, this class explores how forgeries and disinformation were intended to influence US and other public opinion and/or decision-making, and how they succeeded or failed. The professor will use copies of actual Soviet KGB forgeries in illustrating the cases.

We will also look at non-Soviet examples, including the fabrication of forgeries online. And we’ll discuss the question of whether or not we, in our digitally exhibitionist, socially-networked culture, are creating everything a forger needs for future operations.

A subtheme of the class concerns deception of intelligence collectors, analysts and consumers.

Required Readings

  • Edward Jay Epstein, Deception: The Invisible War Between the KGB and the CIA (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1989), Chapter 2, “The Trust,” pp. 22-30; Chapter 7, “The Theory of Perfect Deception,” pp. 105-110; Chapter 13, “The Denial of Deception,” pp. 196-215; and Chapter 14, “The Confidence Game” (especially the description of Iranian deception of the Reagan National Security Council in the Iran-Contra affair), pp. 216-225.
  • Anatoly Golitsyn, New Lies for Old (New York: Dodd, Mead & Co., 1984), Part 1, Chapter 1, “The Problems Facing Western Analysts,” pp. 3-9; Chapter 2, “The Patterns of Disinformation,” pp. 10-17; Chapter 6, “The Shelepin Report and Changes in Organization,” pp. 46-51; and Chapter 7, “The New Role of Intelligence,” pp. 52-57; Chapter 9, “The Vulnerability of Western Assessments,” pp. 65-69; Chapter 10, “Communist Intelligence Successes, Western Failures, and the Crisis in Western Studies,” pp. 70-78; Chapter 24, “The Impact of the Disinformation Program,” 309-323. [Cautionary note: This is an important book with good ideas and concepts, but at times the author can overdo them, so readers should be especially discerning. The author often makes inaccurate generalizations and false assumptions, some of which are a few steps beyond reality. For example, concerning the case of the Polish trade union Solidarity, which the KGB infiltrated and attempted to manipulate, Golitsyn jumps to the unsubstantiated conclusion that Solidarity was a KGB operation. I have attempted to assign only sections that are most reliable. Golitsyn was an important defector, but one must be careful in reading defector accounts because of a frequent tendency to expand on their commentaries to issues outside their areas of direct knowledge, while leading the reader to think that the defector remained "in the know." My assessment of Golitsyn is based on the opinions of professional US intelligence officers and other personnel who worked directly with him.]
  • Bruce Johnston and Kim Willsher, “Italy Blames France for Niger Uranium Claim,” Daily Telegraph (London), 5 September 2004.Download Johnston – Italy Blames France for Niger Uranium Claim
  • Herbert Romerstein, “Tricks of the Terror Trade,” Washington Times, 21 July 2004. Download Romerstein, Tricks of the Terror Trade
  • U.S. Department of State, “Forgery, Disinformation, Political Operations,” Special Report No. 88, October 1981. Download Forgery and political operations
  • U.S. Department of State, “Soviet Active Measures: Focus on Forgeries,” Foreign Affairs Note, April 1983. Download Soviet Active Measures Focus on Forgeries

Recommended Reading

Class 11: Chinese propaganda and perceptions management

This class studies the development of the perceptions management theory and practice of the People’s Republic of China toward the United States and other Western countries from the 1970s after Mao’s death to the present.

We will discuss how Beijing shed old propaganda theory for a new, sophisticated approach among decision-making elites and in the population at large; and how the US has found it difficult to identify and counter such operations.

The PRC government has managed to gain influence footholds in both US political parties. We’ll also see how the PRC induced a major US defense contractor to serve as an agent of influence.

Required Readings

Recommended Reading

  • Edward Timperlake and William C. Triplett II, Year of the Rat (Regnery, 2000). This book, written by a former military officer-turned-congressional investigator and a former counsel to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, documents Chinese government penetration of US politics in a case study of the Clinton administration. Above, Mann writes about how Triplett acted as a one-man counterpropaganda team in the Senate against the PRC.
  • Frederick T. C. Yu, Mass Persuasion in communist China (New York: Frederick A. Praeger, 1964). Studies the early domestic propaganda operations of the Chinese Communist Party to consolidate control over the population in the decade after its seizure of power.

 

Class 12: Networked propaganda warfare

Netwar pertains to information-age conflict on the low-intensity, social end of the spectrum in which networked actors, usually small non-state entities or even individuals, could operate conjointly against larger, more powerful targets.

Information technology has empowered networked organization versus hierarchical structures, enabling groups to conduct “statecraft” in a realm in diplomatic, security and military affairs previously reserved for states and trans-state organizations. Netwar creates a challenge for government policymakers, as well as a need to develop theories and strategies for counternetwar.

Required readings (Note: More will be added)

Recommended readings

  • David Ronfeldt and Armando Martinez, “A Comment on the Zapatista ‘Netwar,’” In Athena’s Camp, Chapter 16, pp. 369-391. For more on this, see David Ronfeldt, ed., The Zapatista Social Netwar in Mexico (RAND, 1999).

Class 13: Islamist propaganda in the United States

This class builds on netwar theory with a very intensive lecture on enemy Islamist propaganda and political warfare campaigns surrounding the war on terrorism around the world and within the United States. We will examine enemy threat doctrine of organizations and movements that presently do not practice violence as a matter of policy, those that are presently violent, and those that had been violent but have ostensibly renounced or chosen not to employ violence.

The class discusses: (a) structures, functions, methods and themes of netwar components to promote terrorist causes and frustrate U.S. counter-terrorism efforts; (b) reasons why the US finds it so difficult to counter these networks; (c) security and intelligence shortcomings and requirements; (d) integration of political/information operations with kinetic counter-terrorism operations; and (e) and US government approaches to counter terrorist netwar and propaganda. We will also debate the question: “Did foreign entities with the same strategic goals as al Qaeda shape American perceptions and policy to divert our attention to fighting terrorism as a tactic, and away from defending against or countering those with the same strategic goals?”

We will focus on the Muslim Brotherhood as a case study.

Required Readings

  • Center for Security Policy, Shariah: The Threat To America: An Exercise In Competitive Analysis (Report of Team B II) (Washington: Center for Security Policy, 2010), entire book.
  • Mohamed Akram, “An Explanatory Memorandum on the Strategic Goal for the Group in North America,” Muslim Brotherhood strategic planning document, unpublished, in Arabic with English translation, 22 May 1991. Seized in FBI raid as part of North American Muslim Brotherhood archive from secret subbasement of home of Hamas operative Ismail Selim Elbarasse, Annandale Virginia, August 2004, and entered without contestation as evidence for the prosecution in United States v Holy Land Foundation et al., terrorist finance trial, 2004-2008. MB Explanatory Memo 1991 Read the English translation of this document (or the Arabic original if you are able).
  • J. Michael Waller, “‘Wahhabi Lobby’ Takes the Offensive,” Insight, 5 August 2002.
  • _____, “Domestic Front in the War on Terror,” Insight, 7 January 2002.
  • _____, “Undermining the War on Terror,” Insight, 18-31 March 2003.
  • _____, “Alamoudi and Those Bags of Libyan Cash,” Insight, 28 October-10 November 2003.
  • William H .Webster, Chairman, Final Report of the William H. Webster Commission on the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Counterterrorism Intelligence, and the Events at Fort Hood, Texas, on November 5, 2009 (Publisher redacted; heavily redacted final report released July 2012). Webster Commission redacted final report
  • More readings will be added.

Recommended Readings

Leave a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Powered by WordPress | Deadline Theme : An AWESEM design